So What Will The Jury Say?
Let’s say that the worst happens, and you are FORCED to fire…
Further, let’s say you absolutely have made the right decision in doing so (I pray that is the case!)
In Ohio, one is permitted to fire enough rounds, and only enough rounds, to STOP the threat.
How many rounds do you suppose that might actually be?
Personally (and this is NOT legal or other advice), I was trained in the military, with rifle or pistol, to fire 3 shots to center-mass, and am pretty sure that if my “fight or flight” reflex kicks in, that is how I would still respond to a lethal threat, given there’s NO other way around it. But, wonder what a jury would have to say about that?
Why not just one shot? Or two? Why idd it have to be three? — they may very well ask such a question.
MY response would simply be that it was a result of military training. However, is that gonna fly? Will I lose my “self-defense” defense in court? If so, how is that ok?
I’ve been thinking about this a whole lot, and am concerned about the topic is why I wrote this post.
It is my personal opinion that, when someone’s amygdala (that fight or flight part of the brain) takes over, and there’s a HUGE adrenaline rush, I may actually even empty my magazine and reload just to be sure. Will that land me in jail I wonder?
If YOU were a juror, how many rounds would you consider a “fair” amount to stop a threat with a gun in THEIR hand(s)?
Just curious as to what people might think about this particular question. I reckon I’ll just have to decide for myself, and train accordingly. How about you?